|
|
|
April 28, 2000
I first met Jayne Anne
Phillips in a city of puppets, on a night of daggering rain. It was Prague,
the summer of 1995. She was across a gilded, mirrored room, across a table
strewn with apples and cheddar, and I remember watching how she moved through
the writers who had assembled there -- moved through them, touched a hand
to them, then escaped them, just in time. I remember how her long, crimped
hair sat on her shoulders like a cape, like depth, a protection. She seemed
otherworldly among the rest of us, unspoiled by the rain. She seemed to be
dismayed by all the crackling, smacking loudness.
Standing there, observing
Phillips, I was struck by contradictions, as readers of her work have always
been. Here was the originator of characters who marched straight out of the
dark side and spoke: "Jamaica, you black doll, wobbling like a dead girl sewn
of old socks ..." Here was the author of tender reminiscence: "My mother's
ankles curve from the hem of a white suit as if the bones were water." Here
was the teacher -- at Brandeis, at Harvard, at Boston University, elsewhere
-- with the reputation for being obsessed with the minuscule, the line edit,
the word and its hyphen, the punctuation mark.
"Have you been to the
Castle?" She came toward me.
I shook my head no.
"Well, tomorrow," she
said. "Tomorrow we'll go. Your family. My family. Here's my number. Call by
10."
We spent the next day
jostled by the summer crowds of Prague, in the darkened corridors of St. Vituvius
Cathedral, beside the violet drapes of burnished confessionals. We spent it
beneath the pinched-up height of vaulted roofs, before the ardent depictions
in colored glass. Outside there was summer heat and triangulated gardens,
a clan of singers in velvet green and ochre frocks. Phillips was there with
her husband and two sons. My little boy and husband were with me. We made
our way out of one knot and penetrated another.
We finally crossed the
Charles Bridge. It was hot; morning was done. We bought postcards, jewelry,
architectural miniatures. Then, saying little to one another, we parted in
Mala Strana. I turned to watch her go. I saw how it was. Jayne Anne in the
center. Her two sons on either side, her husband nearby. Jayne Anne Phillips:
a mother and a wife.
"Black Tickets," the
1979 short-story collection that catapulted Phillips to fame at 26, is best
remembered for its explicit fractions of lascivious lives, for the teenage
whores and drifters who erupt from stories like "Stripper," "Lechery," "Country"
and "Gemcrack" and deliver their inimitable street poetics. And yet it's the
book's familial stories that seem most haunting and mysterious, even prophetic.
It's the daughters narrating
these stories who stand out, the young, between-places women who come home
and don't belong. They talk to their mothers about sex and orgasms. They offer
their naked mothers a towel after a bath. Between these mothers and their
daughters there is telepathy and disagreement. Perpetually a sickness lingers,
a fear, rumbling near the surface, of loss.
In the story called
"Home," a daughter remembers a cycle of care. Phillips was in her early 20s
when she wrote these lines:
My mother doesn't forget
her mother. Never one bedsore, she says. I turned her every fifteen minutes.
I kept her skin soft and kept her clean, even to the end.
I imagine my mother
at twenty-three; her black hair, her dark eyes, her olive skin and that
red lipstick. She is growing lines of tension in her mother. Her teeth press
into her lower lip as she lifts the woman in the bed. The woman weighs no
more than a child. She has a smell ... .
I did all I could,
she sighs. And I was glad to do it. I'm glad I don't have to feel guilty.
No one has to feel
guilty, I tell her.
And why not? says my
mother. There's nothing wrong with guilt. If you are guilty, you should
feel guilty.
My mother has often
told me that I will be sorry when she is gone.
Reading "Home," one senses
that the complicated affection of an adrift daughter for her sensible mother
is Phillips' truest subject, the thing she has turned over and over in her
mind, seeking its heat, sifting through its ashes. Several stories later in
"Black Tickets" -- following fragments of near pornography, lines gorgeously
twisted -- "Souvenir" returns the reader to the emotional space that Phillips
carved out with "Home." Here the daughter is named Kate and the mother, a
school administrator, has a brain tumor. Kate has come to the hospital to
abide the news with her mother, to wait for an operation that may or may not
bring a cure.
Her mother pulled
the afghan closer. "I've been thinking of your father," she said. "It's
not that I'd have wanted him to suffer. But if he had to die, sometimes
I wish he'd done it more gently. That heart attack, so finished; never a
warning. I wish I'd had some time to nurse him. In a way, it's a chance
to settle things."
"Did things need settling?"
"They always do, don't
they?" She sat looking out the window, then said softly, "I wonder where
I'm headed."
"You're not headed
anywhere," Kate said. "I want you right here to see me settle down into
normal American womanhood."
Her mother smiled
reassuringly. "Where are my grandchildren?" she said. "That's what I'd like
to know."
"You stick around,"
said Kate, "and I promise to start working on it."
In the wake of enormous
commercial and critical success for "Black Tickets" ("a crooked beauty," Raymond
Carver said; the signs of "early genius," opined Tillie Olsen), Phillips did
not yield to the common diseases of early fame -- arrogance, paralysis.
Within five years, she
had produced her first novel, "Machine Dreams." Nominated for the National
Book Critics Circle Award, chosen as one of the best 10 books of the year
by the New York Times Book Review, Phillips' first novel begins with a chapter
titled "Reminisce to a Daughter" and goes on to explore an ordinary family
against the backdrop of war. Once again, a mother and a daughter are central
to the story. Their bond is both fractured and necessary; loss is threatening,
adulthood is closing in.
In 1994, following a
long period during which Phillips gave birth to two children and suffered
the death of both her parents from cancer-related illnesses, she published
"Shelter," a novel steeped in darkness and twisted lure. The book begins,
"Concede the heat of noon in summer camps," and then asks even more of its
readers, above all a willingness to travel to the heart of unabashed evil
and then grope back out toward the light.
While many critics hailed
"Shelter" as a major step forward, others shied away from the book's dense,
lyrical rendering of the loss of innocence. Sales -- at 22,000, strong for
a book of literary fiction -- did not meet its publisher's expectations.
For a writer who had
early on won critical raves and commercial success as well as two National
Endowment for the Arts fellowships, the task of producing another full-length
work could have been wrought with new pressures and doubt. But Phillips, who
has always maintained that she writes for her own "psychic survival," persisted
-- quietly, resolutely, bowing to nothing but her own imagination. Anyone
who tried to interview her during those years hit a wall. She insisted on
the big, white line between the books she wrote and the life that she was
working hard to live.
In Prague, I knew Phillips
first as the hub of her family -- the mother of two sons and the wife of an
amiable physician whose eyes I once saw wet with tears as his wife read an
essay about her work. Sometimes, in that place of seashell-colored buildings
and accordion music and weddings that seemed spontaneous and hopeful, our
families would explore together: boutiques and towers, the checkered countryside.
She was guarded, perpetually cautious, never carefree. She was, it always
seemed to me, more comfortable alone.
And yet. When it was
just Phillips and me, just the two of us over hot chocolate and coffee, she
was also generous and vulnerable, refreshingly direct. She would tell stories
about Sam Lawrence. He was the editor whom she discovered while attending
a workshop at a writing conference, a man she later called, in an inscription
in her novel "Shelter," "the angel of my writing life, in every word." He
was her editor until he died six years ago, another grueling, heart-rending
death for the author. Phillips remembered:
"Mr. Lawrence," I asked
him, "do you publish short stories?"
"Not if I can help
it," he said. I gave him an edition of "Sweethearts" [published by Truck
Press in 1976] and he phoned me and asked me to bring my stories to Boston.
And that's how it began.
Phillips would talk,
too, about her interest in stories and monologues that evoke an entire world.
She would ask about me, about my ambitions. And the more I got to know her,
the more she talked about a book she was just then working on, a book that
seemed laden, forbidden, seductive, a book that it was finally time to write.
It didn't have a name
back then. It was a pastiche of images drawn from life. "I've been writing
about the lining in a baby's drawer," she'd say, and then she'd go on to name
the specifics -- a white bureau, paper adorned by pastel teddy bears small
as polka dots -- each word meticulously chosen, each word, it occurred to
me, a tax on memory and imagination. "I've been writing about a daughter and
a mother. I've been writing about cancer. I've been writing about birth."
It seemed that it was important not to press, to simply listen and wait for
whatever might be coming next.
And so I waited and I
listened and I understood that Phillips wasn't a daughter anymore. Life had
turned her on its pivot and taken her to the opposite side of the breach.
She was the mother now -- she was the one who had to take care, who had to
soothe, who had to hone her own lonely instincts and finally trust them. Her
subject now was motherhood. The daughter lived in memory.
When I saw Phillips
again it was 1996, the Bread Loaf Conference in Middlebury, Vt. The book that
had been fragments in Prague had matured into chapters, an overarching vision.
"MotherKind," as the
book would soon be known, would capture nearly a year in the life of a young
woman named Kate, whose first pregnancy and bewildering months as a parent
coincide with the exquisite pain of caring for her dying mother. Two stepsons
would be featured in the book, as well as a first son, a doctor husband and
a town near Boston. Kate would be a writer born and raised in West Virginia.
The mother, Katherine, would be a former schoolteacher who never would quite
stop sharing her every confidence with her daughter. The book would carry
the past into the present. It would look back at what had been lost, at things
dissolved. It would be told in an airtight third person, from Kate's perspective.
From the back of a drafty
auditorium, I listened as Phillips read an early chapter. In the scene that
day, the baby was home from the hospital. Katherine, the mother, had come
to live out her final months in Kate's unruly house. Kate was nursing; she
was drifting through her life:
He was her blood. When
she held him he was inside her; always, he was near her, like an atmosphere,
in his sleep, in his being. She would not be alone again for many years,
even if she wanted to, even if she tried. In her deepest thoughts, she would
approach him, move around and through him, make room for him. In nursing
there would be a still, spiral peace, an energy in which she felt herself,
her needs and wants, slough away like useless debris. It seemed less important
to talk or think; like a nesting animal, she took on camouflage, layers
of protective awareness that were almost spatial in dimension. The awareness
had dark edges, shadows that rose and fell. Kate imagined terrible things.
"MotherKind" is the
sort of involving, brokenhearted book that easily could have devolved into
the sentimental in another writer's hand. It relates a circumstance and not
a plot. It divulges how it feels to need a mother, to lose a mother, to become
a mother.
This is a book about
forfeiting the strongest link one has to one's self, about turning around
and spinning a web toward the baby in one's arms. It's about the circle of
healing that does not close, about what will never be replaced. There is poetry
on the fringes; there is real life in between; there is the planted perspective
of the protagonist Kate, who never wavers from what faces her, nor from her
own reactions to many uncontrollable fates.
"MotherKind" is a book
for families, but it is a book for writers, too, shot through with Phillips'
own lessons about words and the indelible weights they carry. Early in the
book she writes:
Words are so often
maligned by their meanings; Kate conceives of words as implements of pure
energy, washed, infused, shadowed or illumined by all they carry in endless
combination with one another. She writes words and works with them, for
pay and for succor; she believes words open in the intangible spheres of
their construction, yet stay apart from the world of use, innocent of motive,
of healing or harm.
"MotherKind," Phillips
says today, "is about paradoxes and patterns. It is meant to invite the reader
into a layering of experience that is nearly limitless, yet wholly ordinary
and familiar. I want this book to reach the large number of readers who are
actually grappling with these issues in their day-to-day lives, and then to
look beyond those lives, into what surrounds all of us."
She speaks to me from
her home in Boston, her boys in the background, her mind busy with a syllabus
she is preparing on a course called Primal Pictures, a course that, she says,
"focuses on primal loss and its role in the development of the artist's consciousness."
She speaks to me, wary, as she has always been, of taking what she has wrought
into the world, of trusting the rest of us with the secrets she shares.
"MotherKind" is a book
about loss by a writer famous for her protected loneliness. It is a stunning
meditation on family by a woman who pioneered a shocking rootlessness. It
is a lesson in writing by an author who is known to spend days patiently beading
together words, knotting them into place, securing the clasp.
Whatever happens next
with the book is beyond Phillips' control. She understands this better than
most writers do, understands the separation between a person and a book, the
demand that each be evaluated on its own mysterious, ineluctable terms.
salon.com
| April 28, 2000
|